Construction Software State of the Industry Report

by

Founder & CEO, Software Advice

This is the first in a series of "state of the industry" reports in which we will share our observations on construction industry software trends. While reporting the recessive state of the industry is not breaking news, there are some interesting trends that we can share. Not everything is gloomy, and significant technological shifts are underway.

constState-091104

Our observations are based on roughly 6,000 conversations with construction software buyers over the past year. In these calls, our team listened to buyers’ “pain points” – the business problems they were looking to solve with new software. From there, we recommended what we felt were the best solutions. We later surveyed each buyer to find out if they ended up buying software, what they bought and how it all went.

Estimating and takeoff solutions are in demand
We’ve seen a very healthy level of interest in construction estimating software across all divisions. Over and over we hear contractors saying something to the effect of, “Bidding has gotten very competitive, which means I’ve got to be as accurate as possible.” As a result, we’ve seen a lot of estimators replacing their spreadsheets and manual processes with database-driven estimating systems.

We’ve also seen plenty of interest in on-screen takeoff software. We’ve seen three primary reasons for this:

  • Increasing the speed and accuracy of takeoff measurements (see previous paragraph);
  • Avoiding the printing costs of paper plans; and,
  • Responding to increasing electronic plan delivery and use of online plan rooms.

While demand for onscreen takeoff appears fairly strong and growing, we have seen a considerable amount of downward pricing pressure in that market.

Software as a Service is in the right place at the right time
Software as a Service (SaaS) is gaining momentum in many software markets. In fact, we would agree with other IT prognosticators that SaaS is a major structural shift in software deployment and is here to stay. We’ve seen this model succeed in the project management segment where there is a clear need for the collaborative benefits of web-based software. Moreover, the current recession is making the SaaS model more attractive to contractors because:

  • Subscription pricing can easily be added to a project’s general conditions;
  • Low up-front costs allow project managers to avoid an onerous approval process; and,
  • Faster and less expensive implementation makes the new systems more digestible.

We have not seen much demand for SaaS accounting, estimating or service management, although we do get asked about it now and then. We also have not seen many vendors emerge to deliver that sort of solution. We would not be surprised to see SaaS accounting and/or estimating solutions emerge over the next few years.

LEED credit tracking creates new demand
Another trend driving the adoption of SaaS project management systems is the increasing demand for LEED credit tracking. LEED certification has grown in popularity; so too has the need to track the detailed documentation requirements related to earning LEED credits. At their core, projects seeking LEED certification need document control and efficient communication. This is the core of what project management systems deliver. Going one step further, we are seeing a number of project management vendors building in specific LEED credit tracking modules within their system. Houston Neal wrote a great post on how to Track LEED v3 Credits in Project Management Software back in July.

Stimulus funds are trickling down, slowly
Government and other civil construction has remained healthier than commercial and residential construction. However, we have not seen the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) have a big impact on software spending. We believe that the temporary nature of stimulus spending is not enduring enough to drive capital investment in software systems. Our hope is that ARRA will help accelerate the economy to a point where traditional IT investment levels resume. However, Chris Thorman recently wrote a quick analysis of the ARRA that showed that stimulus spending has had a nominal effect on putting roughly 1.6 million unemployed construction workers back on the job.

There has been speculation that Stimulus-funded construction projects would drive sales of project management software. The thinking behind the forecast was that ARRA projects would require a higher level of accountability. Project management software – known for strong document tracking capabilities – would provide the audit trail needed for this transparency. However, we have not seen this translate into a meaningful increase in sales.

Fewer accounting & job costing replacements
We’ve seen fewer firms replacing their core accounting and job costing systems over the last year. In prior years, we had seen replacement activity when company growth pushed existing systems to their limits. In the absence of growth, more firms seem to be staying put with their existing systems. Firms that are buying new accounting systems tend to identify one or more of the following three pain points:

  • Inability to achieve detailed job cost reporting from “generic” accounting systems;
  • Lack of integration to project management or service management systems; and,
  • The need to accomplish same amount of work with fewer employees.

Outlook for 2010
As the construction industry begins to rub its sleepy eyes, we agree with most experts who say that 2010 will be a transitional yet slow year for the industry as a whole. Company budgets likely won't fully recover in 2010, limiting the purchase of construction software. However, so far we've noticed more activity this quarter than any other this year. Hopefully this level of interest will carry over to 2010.

Meanwhile, we're eager to hear your anecdotes. Do you have a firsthand account of the economies' affect on IT spending? Leave us a comment below.

 
  • http://www.smartbidnet.com James Benham

    Don,
    Good article. We’ve seen the same thing with our software – increased competition and scarcity of jobs has resulted in a tighter bidding market and more demands on estimators time. This, of course, has resulted in them looking for solutions that can help them become more efficient and effective. The other very interesting thing we saw was the dramatic shift to hard bid from negotiated work, resulting in much high utilization rates from our existing clients in regards to sending out invitations to bid, etc. Needless to say, it’s been an exciting and dynamic fourteen months. Thanks again for the article.

    - James Benham
    SmartBidNet.com

  • Jason B Ong

    I’m not sure if this is relevant, but I’ve been using on-screen take in NSW Public Works (sydney, Australia) for many years. We do our QTO direct from dwg/pdf files, dual screens, although I am not familiar with the US estimating software

  • http://www.surgeforward.com Saas

    good article. Construction is getting VERY competitive now, there are so few jobs out there and contractors going out of business daily. It is likely not to get much better, saas is, I think, the answer to expensive estimating software.

  • Blogs by Market:
  • Subscribe to the Software Advice Construction Blog

Popular Blog Posts