Should CCHIT Influence Your EHR Selection?

by

Founder & CEO,

In 2010 the Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology – CCHIT – became an ONC Authorized Testing and Certification Body or ONC-ATCB. They are one of six organizations that can certify electronic health records to support "meaningful use" criteria outlined in the Stimulus Bill (for more information, read The Stimulus Bill and Meaningful Use of Qualified EHRs / EMRs). To learn more about ONC-ATCB certified EHRs, visit our buyer's guide or view a free demonstration of these popular systems:

ProductSizeNotes
ADP AdvancedMDDemo1 to 10 physiciansAdvancedMD is a web-based EHR that is widely used. They also have a strong network of integration partners.
Allscripts
Demo
1 to 50+ physiciansAllscripts has received 2011/2012 ONC-ATCB certification for all of its products.
Aprima (formerly iMedica)
Demo
1 to 25 physiciansAprima offers both on-premise and web-based systems for small and medium practices.
Greenway
Demo
1 to 50+ physiciansGreenway is one of the first EHR vendors to receive ONC-ATCB certification.
eClinicalWorks
Demo
1 to 50+ physicianseClinicalWorks has both ONC-ATCB certification and the CCHIT's more rigorous, independent certification.

The CCHIT has gained substantial momentum since the organization's founding in 2004. As a result, buyers of electronic health records (EHRs) – or electronic medical records (EMRs), as they are also known – often ask me what role CCHIT certification should play in their purchase decision. The answer is not always simple, so I decided to explain what CCHIT is, what it is not, and why some participants have passionate views for or against it.

Which CCHIT certified EHR is right for your practice?

What is CCHIT?
CCHIT is a private, non-profit organization formed to certify EHRs against a minimum set of requirements for functionality, interoperability and security. It was founded in 2004 by three industry associations (HIMSS, AHIMA and the Alliance). It was subsequently funded further by the California Healthcare Foundation and a group of payers (e.g. United HealthGroup), providers (e.g. HCA) and software vendors (e.g. McKesson). In 2005, CCHIT was granted a $2.7 million contract by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to support its mission. A number of other medical associations have since supported CCHIT. Despite the HHS contract, CCHIT is not an extension of the federal government.

As of March 2009, Eighty-some ambulatory EHRs received certification against the 2006 CCHIT criteria, sixteen EHRs received certification against the more rigorous 2007 criteria and twenty have achieved CCHIT certification for the 2008 Ambulatory EHR criteria. We estimate this equates to roughly 30% of all ambulatory EHRs being certified, while additional EHR vendors are currently pursuing certification for their systems.

Visit this page for a list of CCHIT certified EMRs / EHRs.

What are the benefits of CCHIT?
CCHIT is performing an important role in defining EHR functionality and promoting standards for EHR interoperability and security. While most healthcare participants agree that moving medical records to an electronic format is important, there is little consensus on what should constitute an EHR and how those systems should securely share data. The problem is complicated by the large number of EHR products (~300), an unending barrage of marketing claims and the unfortunate reality that many EHR implementations fail.

CCHIT has taken on the task of defining the key functional components of an EHR, how it should communicate with other systems and how it should protect patient information. The CCHIT criteria consist of a list of detailed product capabilities against which EHRs are evaluated. At the very least, CCHIT has created a functional requirements checklist for EHR buyers. Adopted in full, CCHIT has provided buyers with a list of EHRs that meet every one of these requirements.

Why does CCHIT generate some controversy?
As CCHIT gains momentum, many EHR buyers are using its certification as a filtering mechanism for which EHR products to include in their selection process. Moreover, many payers, associations and healthcare information exchanges (HIEs) are also mandating CCHIT certification in various ways. This, of course, is CCHIT's intended role. Software vendors that are CCHIT Certified® like this trend because it is more likely their products will be included in those purchase decisions. Non-certified vendors hate it because it eliminates them from those opportunities, even if their product could have been a good fit for the provider. The most intense detractors have labeled the organization an anti-competitive “cartel” that forces small vendors out of the market. We don't support the cartel allegation, but we also don't downplay the impact that CCHIT is having on the EHR competitive environment. Both supporters and detractors of CCHIT make logical arguments as to what role CCHIT certification should play in EHR selection processes.

Why doesn't every vendor just get certified?
It's not that easy. Many non-certified vendors object to the certification fees – $29,000 for the initial review and $6,000 in annual maintenance fees over the three-year certification. CCHIT charges those fees to support its twenty-person staff and compensate the jurors that perform the EHR product reviews. In our opinion, the fees are not nearly as significant as the cost of developing the CCHIT-required product capabilities. The cost of developing some features could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, depending on the effectiveness of the vendor's development team and the extensibility of the underlying software code. This is often a more acute issue for vendors that sell at a lower price point. For example, many vendors have a deliberate strategy to offer a lightweight, easy-to-use EHR for simple SOAP notes and patient records. While that type of product offering would meet demand from a large segment of the ambulatory market, it would not meet the broad set of functional requirements set forth by CCHIT. It's particularly frustrating to these vendors if their customers are not asking for every one of the capabilities that CCHIT requires.

Talk to an expert now about CCHIT certified EHRs

What are the criteria used by CCHIT to certify EHRs?
As of March 2009, CCHIT certifies EHRs based on about 475 criteria spanning EHR functionality, interoperability and security. These criteria start with basic functions like managing a patient record, patient history and clinical notes. However, they expand on those basic features by requiring more advanced functions like pharmacy and laboratory integration. These are great capabilities that could improve provider efficiency and patient care if adopted effectively. However, does every physician need and want them? No, not everyone. Nevertheless, if an EHR product does not have every CCHIT-required capability, it will not be certified; that is, CCHIT is all or nothing. Every criterion must be met for an EHR to achieve certification. There is no partial or feature-by-feature certification.

What important criteria does CCHIT not evaluate?
As just noted, CCHIT certifies EHRs based on criteria for functionality, interoperability and security. At this point, CCHIT does not evaluate:

  • ease-of-use of EHR software products;
  • financially viability of the company offering the EHR software; or,
  • the quality of customer support offered by the software vendor.

CCHIT makes all of these exclusions very clear in their 2007 Physician's Guide:

One thing hasn't changed, and that's the necessity of your doing some pre-purchase homework. While [CCHIT] certification evaluates the EHR product, learning about the company behind the product is an essential part of the purchasing process and remains your responsibility.

Does CCHIT evaluate specialty EHRs or templates for specialists?
Another important element of EHR selection is the product's ability to support specialties with unique EHR requirements. At present, CCHIT offers optional certifications for cardiovascular medicine, child health, inpatient and emergency department EHRs. In 2009, the organization will evaluate behavioral health EHRs, develop criteria for certifying HIEs and delve into other technologies including personal health records and electronic prescribing. It will take some time before CCHIT is capable of evaluating the full range of specialty EHRs or specialty templates.

We think this is especially important given that many specialty EHRs are developed by smaller vendors. Their addressable market opportunity is smaller, their development budgets are smaller and their product development prioritizes features required by the specialty. For example, a solo obstetrician will certainly be focused on how an EHR manages ante-partum visits, but may not be focused on a requirement for the system to support multiple physicians. CCHIT does not assess ante-partum templates, but it does require multi-physician support.

Will CCHIT result in higher prices for EHRs?
Critics often contend that CCHIT certification will lead to higher EHR prices because: 1) vendors will have to pass on the cost of certification and new feature development; and, 2) certification will limit competition by narrowing the number of competitive software vendors.

Regarding the first point, we think it is unlikely that vendors seeking CCHIT certification will be able to pass on their expenses to their customers. The market is simply too competitive. Instead, the vendors will likely bear the cost themselves in the form of lower profit margins. Non-certified EHRs may even have to lower their prices to remain competitive.

As for the second point, one hundred EHR vendors should be more than enough suppliers to ensure price competition. However, many of the current CCHIT Certified EHRs have traditionally been the more expensive products, in large part because they offer more features. If you want a CCHIT Certified EHR today, you may pay more. Over time, as more vendors build out CCHIT's required capabilities, products will gain functional parity and price competition will likely ensue.

Where CCHIT will affect pricing is if it leads to the elimination of low-cost or open source (i.e. free) EHR products that can't afford to clear the CCHIT hurdle. A low-cost provider strategy will not be possible if those vendors are forced to offer a fully functional EHR. The cost of developing a fully functional EHR is too high to sell the product at low prices.

Will a CCHIT Certified EHR improve my practice's income?
CCHIT claims to “open up the flow of HIT incentives from payers and purchasers.” Indeed, CCHIT specifies the functionality needed to measure and report on those quality indicators required for pay-for-performance incentives. In fact, CCHIT is the only federally recognized certification body for EHRs and is therefore important to any physician practice seeking to participate in upcoming payment incentive programs from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Meanwhile, CCHIT Certified EHRs qualify for a special exemption from the Stark and anti-kickback laws, so that local hospitals or health systems can subsidize a physician's EHR purchase. Non-certified EHRs can also meet the exemption, but CCHIT is a reliable means of ensuring the interoperability required for an exemption. Finally, some malpractice liability insurers offer discounts to providers that use CCHIT Certified EHRs. Keep in mind, implementing a CCHIT Certified EHR is not the only path to achieving these benefits and it is not a guarantee that a physician will be eligible for each of these incentives.

Do I need a CCHIT EHR to participate in my local HIE?
HIEs and Regional Health Information Organizations (RHIOs) are playing an increasing role in mandating how payers and providers in a region share patient information electronically. In fact, there are recent examples of these types of organizations mandating that physicians adopt a specific EHR before “hooking up” with the exchange. For example, Partners HealthCare System in Massachusetts required all of it's primary physicians to have adopted electronic health records by Jan. 1, 2008 and all specialists to adopt them by the end of 2009. To retain their network status, physicians in the network were required to adopt either Partners' own EHR or another EHR from GE Healthcare – both of those EHRs are certified. According to their latest report card, 98% of their primary care physicians and 83% of specialists have adopted full use of the EHR. Of course, that does not mean that all RHIOs will impose as strict a mandate, but the conservative buyer should certainly get a sense for their local exchange's EHR requirements before investing in a new system.

Conclusions and recommendations
CCHIT promotes that through their certification process, the organization “sets the bar for EHR products.” We agree. However, we question if that bar has been set too high relative to most ambulatory care organizations' current requirements and IT capabilities. Even if a majority of EHR vendors achieve certification, will physicians follow suite by adopting the functionality specified in the CCHIT criteria? As we review the list of CCHIT Certified EHRs, we recognize many great software products. We see great benefit to the features specified by CCHIT. However, we can't help but wonder how long it will take for the traditionally “late adopter” physician market to accept and implement the requirements specified by CCHIT's technologically savvy Commission.

So, in the interest of serving our provider audience, here are five key takeaways for use in determining CCHIT's role in your EHR selection:

  • Review the CCHIT criteria yourself and determine the relevance of each to your ideal workflow. The criteria are well defined, so even if you do not need every capability, you could select a subset for use in evaluating EHRs for your practice.
  • Understand the binary nature of CCHIT certification. If an EHR does not fully address each of the CCHIT requirements, it will not be certified. Therefore recognize that there are many good EHRs that may not achieve certification, but may still meet your requirements.
  • Consider the requirements of your specialty. If you need EHR capabilities specific to your segment of medicine, realize that CCHIT does not yet cover specialties. You have to evaluate specialty requirements on your own.
  • Do your homework on other critical evaluation criteria that fall outside CCHIT, including: ease-of-use, customer satisfaction and vendor viability. CCHIT is very clear that these due diligence items are the buyer's responsibility.
  • Understand the biases of both CCHIT proponents and detractors. It is natural for these industry players to have strong opinions, just be sure to put them in context, do your own research, and understand that the ultimate decision is yours.
 
  • CHKassens

    I am a dermatologist in solo practice. An affordable EMR system, which is specific to dermatology should not need to meet all of the CCHIT mandates. I hope when HHS develops the rules for meeting the requirements for EMR’s being adequate to qualify for the bonuses that they will be reasonable and allow for systems that meet the needs of people such as myself and are not made so expensive as to make the bonus worthless.

  • http://poojaraprolu.webnode.com/ pooja

    Very Good Article

  • John Lewis

    Don:

    You have written a very good article and try to offer a non-biased approached. However, the most important facet for any provider when purchasing an EHR is that it be usable for their specialty. If that requirement is not met, than nothing else matters. Without measuring this, CCHIT fails to be of value to such specialties. Unfortunately, CCHIT vendors use their certification to persuade doctors towards their products. And at higher costs than as you menton, specialty EHR vendors. Then you have doctors that have paid many thousands of dollars for and CCHIT certified EHR that did not work and it ends up being a detriment for them in future purchases . . . and leaves the doctor gun shy and in many cases, angry because they felt mislead. This is happening across the country and is a serious issue. Again, without usability for the doctor, the EHR is just an expensive mistake!

  • http://none Anonymous

    There are both positive and negatives of what CCHIT is doing. Consider the negative impact of CCHIT requirements on the practice of medicine. Example drug to drug interaction checking – in CCHIT requirements there is no identification of what level of interaction is to be recorded (who determines this?). Many physicians turn off low levels of drug interaction checking because of all the “noise” it creates. How are these requirements going to “improve” the process of healthcare?

  • http://www.ChiropracticBillingPrecision.com Dr. Brian

    One of the big draws doctors is the $40,000+ stimulus money they will get when they buy these systems. What most docs do not realize is the money only comes to you in the form of higher medicare reimbursement if you can prove “meaningful use” of a CCHIT system. The definition of “meaningful use” is not defined yet. For some doctors like chiropractors, it might be imposable to ever reach the “meaningful use” threshold. For example one of the required features of a CCHIT system is that it must support e prescriptions. Chiropractors do not prescribe drugs and therefore might never use a system “meaningfully”, and in turn not qualify for stimulus money. There are many other features that are like this.
    In addition, there are no members of the review board that are chiropractors and so it is unlikely they will ever consider the unique requirements that a chiropractic practice may or may not need.

  • http://nst-li.com Brian Van Zandt

    Great Article Don! Lots of good information. I just wanted to point out something that has changed since the article was written. CCHIT has unveiled three certification approaches to replace the current single one.
    - EHR-C, or EHR Comprehensive:

    - EHR-M, or EHR Module:

    - EHR-S, or EHR Site:

    see full article on the CCHIT website – CCHIT makes EHR more accessible: http://www.cchit.org/media/news/2009/06/certification-commission-makes-ehr-certification-more-accessible

  • http://www.nuvolatek.com Jose enrique enciso duran

    we are taking the option 100% opensource over vmware platform.I decide work with openemr from sourgeforce and he say have a great advance in cchit certification but you point the problem clear.This option dont can pay high fees for to be free.Can you say me if they dont can pay to you for tobe here?And to be a good solution anyway for a lot of doctors.Can you answer me?

  • HD

    EMR should be paid for by Medicare/Providers. They are the only users of this information. Doctors don’t need it to care for patients.

    ‘Pay for Performance” incentives are straight out of old-school circus training: an animal that is starving can be coaxed into jumping through more, and higher hoops for smaller rewards…

  • http://info.valantmed.com Soraya Hareez

    Don,

    Thank you for such a thorough, informative article. Being an EMR vendor, we at Valant Medical Solutions are often asked whether we plan to gain CCHIT certification in light of the upcoming Stimulus Bill certification requirements.

    I think an important point for health care providers to understand that while CCHIT has been the main certifying body thus far, there is no guarantee that it will be among the certifying organizations selected by the government later this year. Therefore, it is possible that a previously CCHIT-certified EMR/EHR may not meet all Stimulus Bill criteria and will require additional certification. Many EMR/EHR vendors are awaiting the release of government standards before jumping on the certification boat for this reason.

  • http://emanagercorp.com Kris Mandyam

    We are a small software vendor in the Chicago area with about a 100+ clients. Our philosophy from the beginning has been to provide our clientele easy-to-use, affordable, reliable software and to provide them with exceptional service. Our practice management software has been in use by Physicians for over 25 years.
    Naturally, for a small company like us, keeping costs down is paramount. We deliberately avoid collaborating with other companies (clearinghouses, distributors etc.) that require a substantial up front fee plus on-going charges and quotas to meet, in order to do business with them. CCHIT may have noble intentions (although I have to question the fact that they have received donations/ contributions from big software vendors such as GE, McKesson etc. Their stringent requirements for certification will make it difficult if not impossible for smaller companies that have good, reliable products to compete. Plus, as you’ve mentioned, many small physician offices do not need a lot of the features that are required by CCHIT to function effectively. Is CCHIT interested in making it easier for healthcare providers to adopt EMR systems or does it value it’s big software vendor client’s bottom line more? Just curious!

  • http://www.ichannex.com Janet Vohariwatt

    Don,

    Thank you for an amazingly clear and balanced information about CCHIT. I have read many articles and watch the CCHIT development. Not one of them provide us this great, functional, and very relevant information.

    Most of Healthcare Providers are small and medium size business. Health provisioning is effective when it is integrated, collaborated from the multi-disciplined providers and processors. Without address ease-of-use and flexibly-focus features, and affordability (in setting up, maintaining, and adapting-to-use and future- use) CCHIT is not part of the solution, but indeed become part of the problem. Indeed, someone once said, extreme solution could lead to another more extreme problem.

    I do hope we have someone like you help providing the advice and feedback to HHS and bring some practical and balanced regulation to healthcare.

    Thank you so much for your information.
    JV

    PS. It is not often that I write the comment on Internet. I am still ‘ancient’ in that way.
    But your great work here has driven me. I want to let you know I really appreciate your article!

  • Vishal

    This is very interesting. I also think that true practices do look for financial aspect of their business but I doubt it is only that, I think the patient care is primary to a practioner’s work which cannot be denied.
    This is where I feel technology can play a role. The recent trend of using EHR’s by clinics is a great win-win situation not only to EHR vendors but also to a much greater extent to the physicians and the patients.
    By systematically implementing an EHR solution through a CCHIT certified vendor by following the appropriate guidelines and putting the EHR to ‘meaningful use’ will result in taking advantage of the federal incentives.
    Regarding the topic of ROI, I found a great ROI tool which is really customizable to judge the approximate price of implementing the solution.

    Also the introduction of REC’s through the HITECH act. is a great way to avail of quality EHR solutions at competitive prices. The stiff competition among not only these REC’s but also among EHR vendors ( to become a preferred vendor of a given REC) will result in lot of positives to medical practioners.
    Looking the funding provided to the REC’s, the staggered grant allocation system also promises to be an unbiased way of allocating funds. It will also help in the concept of REC’s helping out each with their own unique business models.

  • KL

    I am new to this whole Health Information field, actually reading this because of an assignment. I have experience on the payor’s end dealing with program integrity issue. I understand that we want all the practices to get on the boat with EHR, but the ultimate goal for the interoperability of information and to be able to use the information more than just keeping records at a solo location is very important. I can see that the cost to get accredited for a small company that tries to provide a low-cost product may seem costly. However, in order to achieve the goal of EHR and really to improve the overall quality of care for patients, I can see the value of what CCHIT requires.

    For provider who complains about the incentive payments will mean nothing if the products are so costly, I guess they can consider the incentive payments as the government paying them to implement EHR vs. they pay their own system out-of-pocket — unless they do not want to be a Medicare provider after 2014, or they would have been retired by then.

  • http://www.mmfemr.com Gramj

    The article is fantastic, thanks for the information! It seems much better to have an open EMR system when it has to follow certain safety protocols and certification processes in order to better protect client information.

  • Blogs by Market:
  • Subscribe to the Software Advice Medical Blog

Popular Blog Posts