Wal-Mart + eClinicalWorks Electronic Medical Records | An Odd Couple with Good Intentions

by

Founder & CEO, Software Advice

The Wal-Mart / eClinicalWorks(eCW) partnership to sell electronic medical records (EMR) software in Sam's Club strikes us as an odd couple. While we think eCW will benefit from this marketing coup, we don't see the relationship lasting over the long term.

Certainly, the intent is good: simplify a traditionally complex and expensive purchase by distributingthrough a low-cost distribution channel. Moreover, eCW is as good a partner as any for Wal-Mart:

  • The product is a comprehensive system built on solid technology;
  • eCW has great momentum and viability; and,
  • eCW has already succeeded as a value leader.

However, we don't think EMR software presents the same economies of scale that Wal-Mart relies on to deliver “everyday low prices.” Wal-Mart can sell a wide range of products at low prices because they negotiate massive bulk purchases, run dramatically efficient logistics and efficiently manage inventory.

Those strengths may make a difference for the Dell hardware they are selling as part of this deal, but it doesn't mean much when it comes to software. Software is essentially intangible – it can be delivered on a CD or via the Internet – and it is easily “manufactured” such that there is almost no variable cost of goods to be whittled down.

As a result, transportation and inventory optimization are irrelevant when it comes to eCW software. Sam's Club members may assume they'll get better prices through this deal, but from what we can tell, the $25,000 price tag is about the same as what they would pay through any other channel (i.e. eCW resellers or direct from eCW) for the same bundle of software, hardware and services.

Furthermore, we do see some very real sales and services challenges arising from this partnership. Simply put: sophisticated, $25,000 EMR systems don't sell themselves. Get a Wal-Mart “greeter” involved and things could get ugly. Wal-Mart has already stumbled a bit trying to support the relatively complex sale of iPhones. EMRs are a far more complex sale. My mind goes to the horribly awkward image of a brilliant, yet intolerant, cardiologist interrogating a greeter about eCW functionality. The mismatch of intellect and clinical expertise could be incendiary.

A $25,000 EMR is a “considered purchase”; for example, a physician practice needs to consider if the system meets their functionally requirements, integrates to other systems (e.g. RHIOs or diagnostic systems) or qualifies for subsidies such as the recent economic stimulus package. eCW certainly does meet many, many providers' needs; however, a physician will not likely buy the system if there isn't a highly qualified representative available to give them comfort through a consultative sales process.

Sam's Club has over 600 locations, which is almost how many employees eCW has. It is highly unlikely that Wal-Mart or eCW would be able to staff up fast enough or effectively enough to provide sales support across a majority of these locations. Nor does that level of staffing seem efficient; I doubt there would be enough physicians coming through Sam's Club door to keep that staff busy.

When eCW is available in Sam's Clubs this spring, we expect that thousands of physicians will stop by to check it out. But they won't buy on that visit. Instead, they'll go back to the office, Google the system and start considering their purchase. They will seek out answers by calling eCW directly and eCW will find itself performing the sales process as usual. The Wal-Mart buzz may drive sales, but it won't lower the inherent cost of sales, which is the critical element for an effective Wal-Mart partnership. Competing EMR companies, meanwhile, will enter the fray one way or another, and the economics of software will allow them to match the Wal-Mart price.

The bigger challenge for eCW will come from the impulsive buyer. We expect that a significant number of physicians will fail to consider their purchase. For one reason or another – a peer recommendation or the Wal-Mart endorsement – will give impetuous buyers enough comfort to buy the system.

Unfortunately, it is highly likely that these buyers will purchase with irrational expectations. They will expect to open the box and be ready to go and they will be disappointed when they see how much work lays ahead, even with a great product like eCW.

In these cases, the eCW product will not be to blame. Instead, it will be the product's inability to meet the expectations of a buyer that never had their expectations set by a straightforward representative. They won't realize that templates need to be configured, data needs to be migrated, staff need extensive training, etc. I fear for the eCW support reps that have to field those calls.

We don't expect this partnership to be a failure. Instead, we think it will accelerate eCW's already impressive growth and position in the market. The awareness generated by the relationship will be well worth it for eCW. As for Wal-Mart, we expect them to realize sooner rather than later that they can make more money elsewhere. They'll give this program a year or so, and then put something a little more traditional on the shelves.

 
  • Gerald McIntyre

    The product is a comprehensive system built on solid technology… OK Solid yes but not necessarily the best choice.

    ~ The eCW program is built on two open source technologies – a database management system called MySQL and the Linux operating system for the server. This may seem appealing to the uneducated buyer because there are freeware versions of these products which makes the initial system purchase much cheaper.
    ~ eCW promotes themselves as Microsoft compatible, but this is client side only.
    ~ Linux is a form of Unix, which is generally considered to be old technology.

  • http://www.retailhealthcarenews.com Zach Evans

    I agree that, while the Walmart/eCW partnership will provide plenty of buzz (for a while), it will not have a huge amount of upside for Sam’s Club. I do, however, see a bit more downside risk for eCW.

    Walmart and Sam’s Club are famous for turning products and categories in to commodities that can be purchased cheaply and, in the case of Sam’s Club, in bulk. EMR software – from any vendor – is not a commodity. As stated above, it is almost never used straight out of the box (like other software sold at Sam’s Club, such as QuickBooks) but almost always needs some level of customization or integration.

    That being said, perhaps eCW has structured their partnership with Walmart to be more of a lead-generation pact rather than a direct sale channel. If this is the case I could certainly see the relationship bearing fruit over the long-term.

  • http://www.cokergroup.com Kay Stanley

    Can EMR Success come in a box off the shelf of a mega-merchandiser? Not without considering the many other factors that are encompassed in a successful conversion. Whatever product and vendor a practice selects requires much more than a simple purchase at a discount price. A complete response is available at http://blog.cokergroup.com/?p=824

  • http://www.cokergroup.com Jeffery Daigrepont

    How the mega-merchandiser will deal with the nuances of various medical specialties is unclear. Go to my Thoughts on Wal-Mart and EMR at http://blog.cokergroup.com.

  • http://blogs.gartner.com/wes_rishel/ Wesley Rishel

    As I noted in my blog “To Halamka on Sam’s Club eCW” I have a somewhat different take on this, although leads to a similar conclusion. Although Sam’s Club is owned by Wal-Mart it is a different operation, closer to Costco. Sam’s Club has a specific marketing channel reaching out to small businesses and through that channel is already supplying many of the needs of physicians practices. So, the model of initial customer approach is not of the kindly old retired guy at the door of Wal-Mart but rather the inside salesperson who has an ongoing client relationship with the office manager.
    As Halamka described it in his blog, “Electronic Health Records from Wal-mart” the handoff to eCW sales occurred shortly after first contact. In this model, eCW has achieved what all EMR vendors are trying to find, a sales channel to small doctor’s offices.
    My concern is that the economics of the deal give short shrift to implementation support. This is described in detail in my blog entry

  • Clark Campbell

    Walmart is profit oriented. When it is to their advantage to make more profit, sometimes people, business and organizations are left in the dust, holding the bag or with their pants down, or bankrupt like small vendors that that are abruptly dropped, or worse, large vendors that are abruptly dropped. Hopefully this will just be a comissioned role that Walmart plays with eCW blackmailed into providing proper customer support at the risk of loosing their reputation. This could be quite possible after having to service a product priced too low or service requirements way beyong their capabilities.

  • http://www.hazelhawkins.com Warren Chan

    We are currently using eClinicalWorks medical Records Systems as the front-end patient registration system to interface with Meditech information Technology back-end system. There are alot of hidden costs that are not revealed during the initial sales consultation process. We are running the application on MS Server 2008 with SQL Database. The implementation and installation team was very inexperienced and we felt like we were a beta site. The contract was very loosely defined and hardware requirements kept changing as things progressed until the cost of hardware tripled in price. eClinicalWorks was never able to provide a clear design plan and could not provide us with any references. They were only interested in making their software look good and required us to buy top-of-the-line equipment for everything. Quite often, it was not clear who was the “customer”. They proclaimed to be experienced in implementing their product with Meditech, but seemed clueless when working with Meditech Engineers when creating the interface. From my experience thus far, they have a very very poor customer service record and will recite corporate policy if you challenge the timeliness of problem resolution. We currently have a server license update problem that has been pending since June 28, 2010. Today is July 14, 2010. Their contract requires a one hour response time to server issues and they fulfilled their obligation when they called us back. We have two brand new servers that they recommended that we buy for redundancy/high availability and performance which has been sitting idle waiting for them to setup now for weeks. Apparently the original project manager, who was incompetant has been replaced with someone who is even worse. I strongly caution anyone interested in this product to do your homework and ask for references and don’t expect too much from their technical support staff.

  • Keith

    Linux is contemporary technology which, like Windows, has a long history.  MySQL is owned by Oracle which is a market leader in database technologies.

  • Blogs by Market:
  • Subscribe to the Software Advice Medical Blog

Popular Blog Posts